QVAC

QVAC vs LM Studio

QVAC

Open-source ecosystem for local-first peer-to-peer AI on every platform.

LM Studio

A desktop application for finding, running and serving local models, with a TypeScript SDK.

Key differences

One of LM Studio's strengths is how little setup it takes to run a local model: models are searched and downloaded in the application, used in a built-in chat, and served on a port through an OpenAI-compatible API. It also publishes a TypeScript SDK and an lms command line tool for driving it from code. QVAC is called as a library from application code, with no interface of its own.

What reaches an end user differs. LM Studio is an application installed on a machine, which other software then calls over local HTTP, so each user needs it installed, updated and running. QVAC is compiled into the application itself, and on iOS and Android no desktop application can fill that role.

The licences differ. The LM Studio application is proprietary, with its client SDKs published under MIT. The QVAC SDK is Apache 2.0 and the Fabric engine is MIT, both permissive, so either can be audited, forked or shipped inside a commercial product.

This page compares LM Studio v0.4.23, released 28 August 2026, against QVAC 0.18.2, meaning the SDK together with the Fabric inference engine at v10297.1.1. Every row was checked against the project's own documentation and release notes on 4 September 2026. Both projects move quickly, so check the current release before you make a decision on either one.

Feature matrix

Feature

QVAC

LM Studio

PLATFORMS

macOS

Yes
Yes

Windows

Yes
Yes

Linux

Yes
Yes

Android

Yes
No

iOS

Yes
No

AI TASKS

Text generation

Yes
Yes

Transcription

Yes
No

Translation

Yes
No

Image generation

Yes
No

OCR

Yes
No

Text-to-speech

Yes
No

RUNTIME SUPPORT

Node.js

Yes
Yes

Bare

Yes
No

Expo

Yes
No

HTTP server

Yes
Yes

CLI

Yes
Yes

P2P

Peer discovery

Yes
No

Inference delegation

Yes

Via LM Link

Encrypted transport

Yes
No

MOBILE SUPPORT

On-device inference

Yes
No

LoRA fine-tuning on mobile

Yes
No

Mobile SDK

Yes
No

LICENSING

License

Apache 2.0

Proprietary

Open weights tooling

Yes
Yes

When to choose QVAC

You are shipping software rather than installing a tool.

You target mobile, where a desktop application cannot run.

You need an auditable, permissively licensed stack.

You need speech, OCR, translation or image generation.

When to choose LM Studio

You want to browse and compare models in an interface.

You are evaluating quantisations by hand before committing.

Your team would rather stay out of a terminal.

You want MLX tuned for Apple Silicon out of the box.

Compare

Ready to build with QVAC?

One SDK, every platform, no rent. Grab it and ship your own local-first AI.

npm install @qvac/sdk